|
1. Government:
|
- defines the
motion whichever way they like, do not complain about it!
|
|
|
- unreasonable
definitions and bad debates which come from them go
against them
|
|
|
- expectable
cases are rewarded
|
1- OPEN MOTIONS:
THB
that coke is it (you could debate 1.
American culture and US policy, 2. Globalization and the spread of popular
culture, 3. Cocaine, …)
2- SEMI CLOSED MOTIONS:
THW
send the boats back (you could debate 1.
Immigration, 2. Fishing rights, …)
3- CLOSED MOTIONS:
THB
representative government has failed (you
could debate: 1. The European Parliament (EP), 2. The house of commons, 3. US
Congress, …)
THW
get tough on crime (you could debate: 1.
Mandatory prison sentences, 2. The 3 strike rule, 3. The death penalty, …)
Roles
of each team/speaker:
First Table:
1. Government:
-
Defines the topic and
provides a debatable case, not a truism,
-
Should predict the
oppositions arguments,
-
Should cover as much
controversy as possible,
-
Should have the best
possible arguments you can come up with.
Prime
minister:
-
Defines the motion,
-
States the case
division/split between the speakers,
-
Produces his positive
matter (2 to 3 arguments)
→1 sentence to state your position
→explain
it further
→2
major forms of support (examples, philosophical points, quotes, …)
→develop
your arguments
→summarize
this
-
A powerful rhetorical
conclusion
→so
because we need to confront this challenge … we are proud to propose …
Deputy
prime minister:
-
Rhetorical introduction,
-
Preview your speech,
-
Answer the oppositions
criticism,
-
Point out what part of
their case they didn’t deal with,
-
Don’t be polite to the
oppositions arguments,
-
Continue with your part
of the constructive case
-
spend a half of your
time on your constructive matter
1. Opposition:
-
Responds to the
governments case,
-
Creates its own positive
matter,
-
Covers as many of the
opposing arguments as possible.
Leader
of opposition:
-
A powerful introduction
-
Mention that you accept
the governments definition, if you do,
-
Preview your case,
-
Rebut the government’s
case,
-
You need to be specific
and organized,
-
Spend no more than half
of your speech on the governments arguments,
-
Develop at least two of
your arguments,
-
Do not use defensive
arguments (such as: not everyone will cooperate), but offensive ones (it is
dangerous and harmful),
-
Conclusion.
Deputy
leader of opposition:
-
Answer the governments
defense (defend your attack),
-
Spend more time on their
new argument (rebut it),
-
Sustain your speakers
arguments,
-
Present your new
constructive matter.
Second Table:
-
Plan but be flexible,
-
Prepare for as many
contingencies as possible,
-
The government and the
opposition both need an extension.
Extension:
-
Produce a new positive
case,
-
Is consistent with the
first table, but provides a different perspective,
-
It cannot contradict the
first table (do not backstab),
-
If the 1. team uses most
of the arguments, you can use one of their arguments, but really blow it up
(deeper analysis)
-
You can look at their
case from a practical/principle level,
-
The extension has to be:
→clear
and well evidenced,
→different,
→it
cannot contradict the 1. team.
2. Government:
-
Extends the governments
case,
-
Has to deal with the
most important points of the first table.
Member
of government:
-
Rebut and refute the
most important points of the first table (focus on the opposition, not the
government – unless their point is crucial to your case),
-
Develop the extension,
link it to the motion and explain how it is faithful to the first government,
-
Fully develop most
(virtually all) of your teams constructive case.
Government
whip:
-
You will be penalized,
if you don’t sum up your line (government),
-
You also need to rebut
the major opposition arguments,
-
Defend your extension,
-
Defend mostly your side
(symbolic defense of the first government),
-
Sum up the first teams
arguments briefly,
-
Rebut the best
opposition argument in the debate,
-
Summarize the debate
(most of your tasks should be done through the clashes),
-
Don’t introduce new
issues.
2. Opposition:
-
Extends the oppositions
case,
-
Also has to deal with
the most important points of the first table.
Member
of opposition:
-
Develop your extension,
-
Concentrate on the
member of government when refuting,
-
Only refute the most
important arguments of the first government (if necessary),
Opposition
whip:
-
Don’t introduce new
issues,
-
If you have to have a
new issue use it in relation to something that was said before,
-
Have your introduction
and summary prepared,
-
You can and should focus
on the issues,
-
Or you can move through
each speaker (not advised),
-
Rebut and refute (very
briefly),
-
Make a clear distinction
between the rebuttal and the summary.
Summation:
-
Be realistic,
-
Introduce the summary,
-
Name and give some
credit to the other side (one argument),
-
Name and give credit to
your side,
-
Explain why yours are
bigger than theirs (why you win):
1. We have bigger numbers (affects more people),
2. Each one of ours is more important than theirs,
3. Ours is more probable (realistic – point to examples),
4. Ours happens first/sooner (is more urgent – need to convince them),
5. Cannot be reversed (things that can be fixed aren’t as important),
6. Involuntary risk is more important than voluntary risk,
7. It is morally required (slavery is morally wrong).
|