Tag Archives: asian parliamentary

CEBU IV

Published / by admin / Leave a Comment

ROUND 1: “Gurlie”
– This house celebrates the “fetishization” of the LGBT in porn (men who watch lesbian porn; women who watch gay porn; shemale)
– This house would fabricate evidence in order to create the impression that historical icons had been gay
– Info slide: A study conducted by Cambridge University describes the role of genetic regulators which influences whether an immature germ cell differentiates into a male or female cell, and how that process can be manipulated. In the future, it is possible for stem cells from a male to be used to produce an egg, allowing an infant to have two biological fathers. Motion: Assuming feasibility, This house believes that the state should heavily subsidize the access to “2-father babies”.

ROUND 2 : “Givenchi kokoli datung”
– This house will impose minimum educational qualification as a requirement to stock market participation
-Info slide: A charter city involves a developing country giving a long term lease on a small area of land to a developed country. The developed country will build and govern a new city for a pre-determined period of time. Motion: This house would establish charter cities in developing countries
– This house will repeal all laws requiring mandatory remittances from Overseas workers

ROUND 3 : “taralets penpen de chorvaloo”
– This house would include E-sports in the Olympics
– This house will allow organized fight clubs
– This house supports the integration of moral choices in games

ROUND 4 : “THROWBEKS”
– This house will go back in time and save Jesus Christ from crucifixion
– This house believes that the Ministry of Magic should require wizards to live in muggle communities
– In case of a zombie-epidemic, This house believes that zombies have a right to a humane life in special zombie-habitats

ROUND 5 : “Huling push? K mo yan ‘teh!”
– Info slide: Kevin really hates Charles. For four years, Kevin meticulously planned how to kill Charles, and he learned that Charles loves eating Lechon belly. Last night, Kevin gave Charles a cyanide laced lechon belly which Charles ate heartedly. To Kevin’s surprise, he saw Charles the next day happy, blooming and healthy. It turns out that Charles is immune to cyanide. Motion:  This house will still charge Kevin with Murder.
– This house will repeal all laws that criminalize any form of speech (Libelous,Seditious, Discriminatory, Slanderous, Defamation)
– This house would not afford religious identity the same level of anti-discrimination protection as inborn traits (ex. race and *sexuality)

QUARTERS: “ Ms. International”
– This house believes that the EU should ban its member states from selling arms to former Soviet States
– This house would make the ratification of the ICC charter as a pre-condition for UNSC membership
– This house believes that the United Nations should tax the profits of all natural resource sales worldwide.

SEMIS : “”Charles is the new Char! Charles!”
– Assuming the technology exists which allows an absolute “mind wipe”, This house would allow convicted criminals to choose it as penalty over incarceration
– If Vatican discovers evidence that the Judeo-Christian God is female, this house will destroy it
– Aromantic is the lack of of romantic attraction towards anyone.TH prefers an Aromantic world

Finals : Madam Josie Rizal
– This house regrets the conception of a National Hero (debated)
– This house believes that Philippines should abandon its claim on Sabah in exchange for Malaysia’s support to the Philippines’ claim to the West Philippine Sea.
– This house will give more votes to those who pay higher income tax

Asian Parliamentary Debate format

Published / by admin / Leave a Comment

This article has been rewritten. It now features a short description of the format, and then you can find a transcript of a longer lecture, if you would like to hear details about the Asian Parliamentary debate format. Don’t forget to Like this page!

# of people in the debate: 6
# of people in a team: 3
# of teams in the debate: 2

Duration of the speeches: Constructive and whip speeches 7 minutes, replies 4 minutes

Questions format: Points of information

This debate format is mainly used in the Asia (news Sherlock :D) and is also the basics of the World schools debate format.

The speakers speak in the following order:
Prime minister
Leader of opposition
Deputy prime minister
Deputy leader of opposition
Government whip
Opposition whip

All these speeches are seven minutes long. Prime minister presents the case, Leader of opp presents its own arguments and rebuttals the gov’s, Deputy PM has also his own argument(s) and makes some rebuttal, of course he/she should not forget that she has to speak about the arguments of the PM and reafirm them. Deputy leader of opp has the same task, meaning new argument(s), rebuttal, own previous arguments. The government whip is allowed to present “new matter” but is advised not to, and the opp whip is not allowed to do that.

Now follow two reply speeches,  first the oppositional and then the governmental reply. The speeches are given by the first or the second speaker from each side. The speeches should focus on the great ideas, arguments, clashes in the debate and present them.

Lecture on the Asian Parliamentary Debate Format

Today we are going to talk about a format of a debate. Debate is basically a structured discussion. So you have some debate formats, that are more open, like a presidential debate, or a town hall debate, where groups of people debate against each other or you have debate formats, that are far more structured. They carefully tell you how much time each person has to speak and so on. Every format has some kind of rules, because those rules serve to preserve order, and try to create some balance. The rules don’t really determine who wins and loses a debate. Debating is not about the rules. The rules are there to create balance, to tell people how much time they have to speak and so on. So in every debate format there will be some direction about the topics, about the timing, about the speaking order and maybe some stuff about the judging criteria, about how do you decide which team wins and which team loses.
Today we are going to focus on the Asian Parliamentary debate Format. This is a format that is widely used in Asia, among University and High School students and I think is a good format. I am going to talk about the teams and the order of speakers, about timing and talk about topic selection and finally talk about points of information.

 

Teams and speaking order in Asian Parliamentary

First let’s talk about the teams and speaking order. In the Asian Parliamentary debate format you have two teams. One team is called the government team, and the other team is called the Opposition team. Sometimes it is referred to them as the Affirmative and the Negative team. The names don’t really matter that much, but just for you to understand the terminology.
The Government team will always support the topic and the Opposition team must oppose the topic. You usually won’t have a choice whether you are the Government or the Opposition on a topic. Each team will have three speakers. Three in Government and three in Opposition and they will speak in alternating order. So first you will have one speaker from the Government, and then from the Opposition, and then the Gov. and then the Opp. and then the Gov. and then the Opp. Each speaker will speak for seven minutes. So an entire debate will take 42 minutes. But hold on. At the end of those 42 minutes, both the teams will get to make an extra speech. How exciting is that? It is kind of a summation speech, where you are comparing the teams, and you are trying to persuade the judge Why my team wins over the other team. So it is not really a speech where you are making new arguments. But we will get into those details later. So at the end of those six speeches, the teams get to make a reply speech. This one is shorter. Remember, the earlier speeches were seven minutes long, this speech will only be 4 minutes long. And if you remember, the government team started the debate by making the first speech, this time the Opposition team will start, by giving the first reply speech. So in essence, the Government team always start the debate, and they always end the debate by having the last reply speech. So that is the two teams, the speaking order and the timing.

Topic selection

Now we come to the topic selection. Every debate needs a topic. In the Asian Parliamentary format, what happens is, you will usually be given three topics, to choose from. So you and the other team can compare and choose the topic which you both like. How this is done is the teams will rank the topics, so the Government team ranks the topics 1., 2. and 3. and Opposition ranks 1, 2 and 3 and then you compare your rankings. The topic which you ranked third will not be debated. They will cancel each other off. The remaining topic will be debated. In the situation where the teams rank the same topic third, but reverse the other two rankings, then you have to flip a coin to decide who gets to debate their first choice. And if both teams rank the same topic as first, then you debate that topic. The only other thing with Asian Parliamentary debate topic format, the last thing I’ll talk about are the Points of information.

Points of information in Asian parly

When speakers are speaking, between the first and the sixth minute of every speech, speakers from the other side have the opportunity to rise up and offer a question. So you can say Point of information, Can I ask a question, On that point, or something to that effect. If I’m speaking, I can choose, whether or not to accept this interruption. So I can say Yes, go ahead, ask your question, Or make a statement, you can say anything you want. But it usually has to be short, about 15 seconds long, that is about two sentences. So you can get up, you can say your statement, or ask your question and then I have to respond to it. I don’t have to accept every question, but if I accept a question, I must respond to that question. So this adds a huge element of interactivity to the debate. So every speaker, Government speaker or Opposition speaker has the chance to be questioned by the other team during their speech. You can only ask points of information to the other team, and not to your own team. And you should take at least one, preferably two points of information in your speech. There are no points of information in the reply speech. So only points of information in the first six speeches in the debate.

Those are the essential parts of the Asian Parliamentary debate format.

This video is a transcript of a lecture, that you can see here.

If you would like to know more about Points of information, there are several articles on this website. A one hour lecture by Sarina Selleck, a lecture by Alfred C. Snider, a lecture by G. Rhydian Morgan and a short article on POI’s by me.
If you like this article, like it, or leave a comment, I love to hear your thoughts!