Tag Archives: tab

Chennai WUDC 2014 tab – results

Published / by admin / Leave a Comment

One of the biggest problems of this WUDC in 2014 is that the tab has still not been released, and it is allready the 5th of january.

Ok, after all the problems, here is the tab. You can download it and check all the results. Click here. I’m not going to post all the results here, because the .xls can be much better. But still, some results need to be posted, so here we go:


The World Champions in the Open category,
Harvard A – Ben Sprung-Keyser, left, and Josh Zoffer
© Henrik Maedler // Chennai WUDC 2014
Harvard A (Josh Zoffer and Ben Sprung-Keyser)

Sydney Union B

Best speaker of Open: Eleanor Jones (Sydney B)


Champion: Berlin A (Dessislava Kirova and Kai Dittmann)

The World Champions in the ESL category,
Berlin Debating Union A – Dessislava Kirova (left)
and Kai Dittmann
© Henrik Maedler // Chennai WUDC 2014

Finalist:Luna A
Babes-Bolyai A
Belgrade B

Best Speaker of ESL: Mubarrat Wassey (IIUM A)


Bandung A (Vicario Reinaldo and Fauzan Reza Maulana)

Tubingen A
Warsaw Debate A
New Economic School A

Best Speaker of the Tournament: Helena Ivanov (Belgrade B)

The World Champions in the EFL category,
Bandung A – Fauzan Reza Maulana (left)
and Vicario Reinaldo
© Henrik Maedler // Chennai WUDC 2014

Champion: Nizamate of Hyderabad (James Torrance and Jordan Anderson)

EUDC 2012 Belgrade results

Published / by admin / Leave a Comment

BPP A (Jack Watson, Harish Natarajan)

Oxford A (Tom Hosking, Hasan Dindjer.)
TCD Hist. A (Christine Simpson, Mark Haughton.)
Cambridge A (Joe Roussos, Ashish Kumar)

ESL Champion:
Leiden A

ESL Finalist:
Berlin A
Tallin A

Best Speakers:

1.Maria English (Cambridge C)
2.Harish Natarajan (BPP A)
3. Rebecca Meredith (Cambridge C)
4. Jack Watson (BBP A)
5. Tom Hoskings (Oxford A)
6. Pam Cohen (Durham A)
7. Joe Roussos (Cambridge A)
8. Lindsay Bing (ULU B)
9. Ashish Kumar (Cambridge A)
9. Richard Robinson (ULU B)

1.Danique Van Koppenhagen (Utrecht A)
2.Yael Bezalel (Tel Aviv B)
3. Thomas Beerthuis (Utrecht A).
4. Roee Levy (Tel Aviv A)
4. Viktor LEvy (Tartu A)
6. Filip Bubenheumer (Berlin C)
6. Engin Arikan (Galatasaray A)
8. Radu Cotarcea (BBU A)
9. Berkay Ozludil (KOC A)
9. Anna Karolin (Tallin A)

Semi Finalist:

Cambridge C
TCD Hist B

Tel Aviv A
Tallinn A

Breaking Teams:

EUDC 2012 Open Break:

1. BPP A (24)
2. TCD Hist A (22)
3. Cambridge A (21)
4. Oxford A (21)
5. ULU B (20)
6. Edinburgh A (20)
7. TCD Phil A (20)
8. Durham A (19)
9. UCC Phil A (19)
10. UCD L&H A (19)
11. TCD Hist B (19)
12. Warwick A (19)
13. St Andrews B (19)
14. UCD L&H C (19)
15. UCD Law A (19)
16. Cambridge C (18)

EUDC 2012 ESL Break:

1. Berlin C (18)
2. Berlin A (18)
3. Utrecht A (17)
4. Tartu A (17)
5. Tallinn A (17)
6. Haifa A (17)
7. Tel Aviv B (16)
8. Tel Aviv A (16)
9. BBU B (16)
10. Galatasaray A (16) =
10. Leiden A (16) =
12. RRIS B (16)
13. Erasmus A (16)
14. BGU B (16)
15. Haifa B (16)
16. Koc A (15) =
16. BBU A (15) =

Leiden A deemed to break tenth, Galatasaray 11th, after a coin toss due to teams finishing tied on team and speaker points.

BBU A qualify 16th for quarter finals, after a coin toss due to teams finishing tied on team and speaker points.

How to manually TAB a tournament

Published / by admin / Leave a Comment
This article is about how to TAB a tournament, if you do not want to use any software, if you do not know how to use it or you just like to depend only on yourself.

It is detailed, to go through the whole TAB process and it even gives you the excel documents, that I use for tabbing. You are welcome to download and share all the info that you find in this post.

We all know, that there are a coupe of different TAB programs out there, that really work, I usually still use paper cards to TAB BP tournaments. The main reason for this is that the tournaments that I tab are rather small. With small tournaments, that have, 3, 4, 5 rooms only, it can be a problem, to tab them with the software. The first problem that I see is the power pair. If you do 5 rounds of power pair, you will have teams constantly debating each other, and this is REALLY boring for them. That’s why I normally make first two or three rounds randomly paired, and go to power pair later. 

Before you start a tournament, you should make sure, that you have all that you need for the TAB. The TAB room should be only the TAB room. It will be much harder for you to TAB, if people are coming in and out of the TAB all the time. I always put a “Come in if you dare” sign on the door. The judges, if they need to bring you their ballots, should knock and wait for you to come out. You will also need a large table and a computer with a printer. A copy machine is a great thing, but you can go without it.

What you do need for a manual TAB are the TAB cards. TAB cards

If you use these cards, you can see that you have a space to enter the team points. What I normally do, is write team points for each round in two steps. If a team gets 2 points in the first round, I write down 2/2. First number represents the number of points, that the team received in the present round, and the second number is the total number of team points. That means if the team gets 1 point in the second round, I write down 1/3 points in the “round 2” space. This is how you always know, how many points a team has all together, and you can check fast how many points they received in this round.

The same thing goes for speaker points (or speaks). You will need the total number of speaker points when you will determine, witch team should go in witch room at power pair. 

You should always fill in all the other parts of the TAB cards, like the judge, position in the debate (I use 1G, 2G, 1O or 2O) and the opponents.

A very important part of the TAB cards is not even there. Because you need to make the pairing that way that every team debates all four positions in the debate, I always make a cross on the right side of each team card. The cross represents the positions in the debate and I write down a number for the round where the team had to debate that position. So the upper left part of the cross is 1st gov, up right is 1st opp, down left is 2nd gov and down right is 2nd opp. If you use this system, it will be much easier for you to determine, in witch position the team should debate next.

If you need to do power pair, you should lay down the cards in a descending order. The team with most team points first then the second team and so on. Now you just lay down the cards in groups of four and you have your power paired rooms. If there are two or more teams, that have an equal amount of points, the team with the bigger speaker points should go to the stronger room (this is why you always count the speaks for all the rounds).

Because you would like to give out the results for the rounds right after the finals end, you need to enter all the results into a excel spreadsheet, so that you can check, if you entered everything right and you can print out all the results and disseminate them after the tournament. I use this  Excel file for it. There is not much to explain, maybe just a hint. When you finish adding the team points for a round, make him SUM up all the points. There is always the same number of points given in every round, so you can check if you made any mistakes.

You will also need Judge ballots, so doc download it here.

If you like this article, please comment. 

EUDC Haifa 2002 Results

Published / by admin / Leave a Comment

EFL Finalists
Oxford C (Tara Mounce and Fraser Campbell) – Winners
Oxford A (Nick Pacheco and Matt Spence)
Hebrew A (Neomi Kreiger and Eli Noverstern)
IDC A (Noga Issachson and Gour Braslavi)

EFL Semifinalists
Leeds A (Tessa Woolfson & Dan Goldschmied)
Limerick A (Julian Moore & Tadhg O’Shea)
Charles A (Milan Konrad & Barbara Havelkova)
Newcastle (Ben Bickets & Alex Ward)

EFL Qfinalists
Tel-Aviv B (Daffi Kudish & Dan Liberman)
IDC B (Ariel Halevi & Yaron Hayat)
Oxford D (Jennifer Twite & Tom Hay)
Cambridge (Jack Anderson & James Mehigan)
Limerick B (Gavin Ward & Eoin O’Coillain)
Oxford B (Andrew Zadel & Tom Goodhead)
IDC C (Avi Elkayam & Oren Shelfer)
Tel Aviv A (Gali Golan & Elad Frenkel)

ESL Finalists
Hebrew A Eli Noverstern & Neomi Kreiger – winners
Charles A (Milan Konrad & Barbara Havelkova)
IDC A (Gour Braslavi & Noga Issacson)
IDC C (Avi Elkayam & Orin Schefler)

ESL Semifinalists
Tel-Aviv A (Gali Golan & Elad Frenkel)
IDC B (Ariel Halevi & Yaron Hayat)
Tel- Aviv B (Daffi Kudish & Dan Liberman)
Hebrew B (Rebbeca Zerdin & Michael Cimerring)